الْبَابُ السَّابِعُ: فِي الْعُلُومِ الْمُشْتَرَكَةِ بَيْنَ السَّنَدِ وَالْمَتْنِ · Book Seven: Sciences Common to Isnad and Matn

صَدْرُ الْبَابِ السَّابِعِ · Opening of Book Seven, before its numbered chapters

الِاعْتِبَارُ · I'tibar (Corroboration-Checking)

The author's own definition: take a hadith some narrator relates, then trace its routes and chains. The goal is to find out if another narrator relates that very same hadith, in the same words or the same meaning, whether through the same chain or through a different Companion. If no one else relates it at all, neither in wording nor in meaning, that tells you something too.

Itr adds an important correction here: i'tibar is not its own separate category sitting next to mutabaa and shahid, the way it might look. It is simply the search itself, the work of checking the chains to see whether a mutabaa or a shahid actually exists for a given report.

↑ Top of page

الْفَصْلُ الْأَوَّلُ: فِي تَفَرُّدِ الْحَدِيثِ · Chapter One: Singularity of a Hadith

الْغَرِيبُ وَالْفَرْدُ · The Rare (Gharib) and Singular (Fard)

The hadith a single narrator is alone in relating, whether alone from an imam whose hadith is gathered or from a non-imam.

Fard, its synonym, is of two kinds: fard mutlaq, absolute, and fard nisbi, relative.

↑ Top of page

الْفَصْلُ الثَّانِي: فِي تَعَدُّدِ رُوَاةِ الْحَدِيثِ مَعَ اتِّفَاقِهِمْ · Chapter Two: Multiple Narrators in Agreement

الْمُتَوَاتِرُ · The Mutawatir

What a large group, whose agreement on a lie is inconceivable, relate from the like of them all the way to the end of the chain, with sense perception as their basis.

"A large group" fixes no number. Some scholars tried to fix one, at seventy, or forty, or twelve, or as few as four, but Itr holds that none of that convinces. What counts is that certain knowledge of the report's truth actually results.

"From the like of them to the end of the chain" rules out a report that falls below mutawatir level in some layer, in the ahad range, and only later gathers mutawatir numbers. Innama al-a'malu bi al-niyyat is the case in point: single at the start of its chain, mutawatir only in the middle, so it is not mutawatir.

"Sense perception as their basis" rules out matters of belief that rest on reason, such as God's oneness, and purely rational propositions such as one being half of two. In those the authority is reason, not reports.

Two kinds: lafzi, in the wording, and ma'nawi, in the meaning.

الْمَشْهُورُ · The Well-Known (Mashhur)

Itr adopts Ibn Hajar's definition: a hadith whose chains are countable and number more than two. "Countable" rules out the mutawatir, which is tied to no fixed number. "More than two" rules out the gharib, which has one narrator, and the aziz, which has two.

Put simply: a group narrating from a group, without reaching the level of the mutawatir.

Being well known does not make a report sound. Numbers alone meant nothing to the hadith scholars unless the chains themselves were sound, or at least fit to strengthen each other, so a mashhur hadith may be sahih, hasan or weak.

Fame is also graded by who it is famous among: the hadith scholars alone, scholars and public together, the jurists, the usul scholars, the grammarians, the literary crowd, or ordinary people. What is famous on people's tongues may rest on a single chain, or on no chain at all.

الْمُسْتَفِيضُ · The Widespread (Mustafid)

The word comes from water overflowing and spreading out.

As a technical term it is disputed, and it belongs mostly to the usul scholars rather than the hadith scholars.

One group of scholars treats it as simply another name for the mashhur. Others hold that the two differ.

Those who separate them disagree over which is wider. Some say the mashhur is wider, because the mustafid must keep the same number of narrators at the start of the chain, in the middle and at the end, while the mashhur need not. Others say the opposite.

A third view: it is whatever the umma received with acceptance, however many narrated it, which makes it the same thing as the mutawatir. Ibn Hajar leaned this way, and said in Sharh al-Nukhba that it is not one of the questions of this science.

الْعَزِيزُ · The Rare-Supported (Aziz)

Ibn Hajar's wording the author endorses: that no fewer than two narrate it from no fewer than two.

الْمُتَابَعَةُ وَالشَّاهِدُ · The Mutabaa and Shahid

Mutabaa is when a second narrator is found relating the very same hadith, reconnecting with the first narrator's chain either at his own teacher or further up. A shahid is different: a hadith from another Companion which resembles the report whose singularity is suspected. Both are corroboration tools scholars use, through i'tibar, to confirm whether a report that looks solitary (gharib/fard) actually has support elsewhere.

↑ Top of page

الْفَصْلُ الثَّالِثُ: فِي اخْتِلَافِ رِوَايَةِ الْحَدِيثِ · Chapter Three: Divergence Among the Narrations

زِيَادَاتُ الثِّقَاتِ · Additions by Reliable Narrators (Ziyadat al-Thiqat)

What a reliable narrator is alone in including in his narration of a hadith, whether a single word or a whole clause, in the chain or in the text. Itr calls this an important field the hadith scholars gave real attention to, searching chains and narrations and working hard over it, before disagreeing considerably over its ruling, disagreement severe enough that some modern writers have gotten the topic wrong.

The commonest form: narrators differing over whether a report is connected or mursal, or over whether it is elevated to the Prophet or stopped at a Companion. Itr's own preferred ruling, against the majority of hadith scholars who favored the mursal or stopped version as more cautious: prefer the connected, elevated version instead, so long as its narrator is a precise, retentive memorizer, and there is no stronger indicator favoring the other version. He cites al-Khatib al-Baghdadi's reasoning: a narrator relating a report as mursal on one occasion does not impugn or contradict him relating it connected on another, since he may simply have forgotten the link once and recalled it later, or narrated both ways deliberately for his own purpose; forgetting does not get to overrule remembering.

One narrator relates an extra word or clause in the wording of a hadith that no one else relates. Itr says scholars disagreed over this even more than over the chain-addition case, until Ibn al-Salah (d. 643H) proposed a resolution that settles most of the dispute, splitting it into three kinds.

الشَّاذُّ · The Anomalous (Shadh)

What an accepted narrator relates contradicting one more worthy than him, by greater number or fuller precision; its opposite, al-mahfuz, is what the more reliable relates.

الْمُنْكَرُ · The Munkar

The author's first path: what a weak narrator relates contradicting the reliable; it stands opposite the maruf and is more strongly rejected than the shadh.

الْمُضْطَرِبُ · The Inconsistent (Mudtarib)

The hadith related by one narrator or more in differing, equally weighted versions, with nothing to prefer among them and no way to reconcile them.

الْمَقْلُوبُ · The Reversed

The hadith in which its narrator substituted one thing for another, in the chain or the text, by mistake or deliberately. The author calls this the most precise definition of it.

الْمُدْرَجُ · The Interpolated (Mudraj)

What is mentioned within the hadith, joined to it without separation, yet is not part of it.

They divided interpolation by where it occurs into two kinds: interpolation of the text and interpolation of the chain.

الْمُصَحَّفُ · The Misread (Musahhaf)

With the hadith scholars: altering a word in the hadith from its known form to another. The musahhaf changes the dotting, the muharraf changes the vowelling while the letters remain.

الْمُعَلَّلُ · The Defective (Muallal)

The hadith in which a defect undermining its soundness is detected while it outwardly appears sound; the author calls it the noblest and subtlest of the sciences. He prefers the term muall.

The alert scholar gathers the narrations of the one hadith and weighs them in chain and text; their disagreement and agreement guide him to the seat of the defect, with attendant indications. This is the most followed and easiest way.

↑ Top of page